Home

Advertisement

Customize
About this Journal
Links:
Elucidations - For Lovers of the Arts... My Writing Portfolio My Writing Journal My Cultural Thoughts Journal Duncan Faure Music
Current Month
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930
Sep. 22nd, 2005 @ 08:37 pm Charlie and the Chocolate Factory: A Wonka-style Elevator Ride
I have to begin this review with a confession: I adore Johnny Depp’s work, all of it.

That said, I wasn’t sure what to expect from the remake of Roald Dahl’s children’s story. Tim Burton has a disturbingly creative odd mind, so I went in expecting, well, oddities. Charlie delivered those well. I’m quite sure that anyone walking in and expecting something close to the Gene Wilder film, and hoping for that, walked out disappointed. There was very little similarity. Frankly, I was glad.

I enjoyed the original. It is a pleasant, heart-warming family movie with plenty of lessons for parents. Not to mention the gorgeous chocolate that covers the screen during the opening credits –- who could turn away from that? On the other hand, the cuteness can, at times, be sickeningly sweet (pun intended). That wasn’t what the author intended.

Willy Wonka, in the original novel, is an odd man –- not one to whom you would entrust your children. Burton hired the perfect actor for the role; one of the few in Hollywood who can actually act. When Johnny is a character, he is that character, even when it is such an odd role the audience could have trouble believing anyone could honestly be that odd. We don’t have trouble believing in Dahl’s Willy Wonka during this film any more than if we were reading the book.

Charlie, the lovable little boy who finds the last golden ticket, is portrayed more aptly in this version, also. Freddie Highmore, who worked in Depp’s previous film, Finding Neverland, charms the audience with his large eyes and humble attitude. We believe this child is honestly as caring and kind as the character he is portraying. We celebrate with him when we watch his dreams come true.

Burton gave the grandparents in Charlie a more important role in this film than they had in Mel Stuart’s version, giving the whole thing a more rounded storyline. They are not simply background characters, but important elements to the plot. In the same manner, the Oompah Loompahs, all played by the same actor, add much depth and personality that I didn’t find in the original. And, we get to see their story instead of simply being told why they were there -– an important element of fiction.

No movie review would be complete without mentioning the special effects. The chocolate is gorgeous in the first version, true. However, everything is a mixture of gorgeous and creepy and everything in between in Charlie. The viewer alternates between a watering mouth, envious eyes, and stomach-churning disgust. They change directions as quickly as Willy Wonka’s elevator. Somehow, though, Burton maintains the odd theme all the way through, while still keeping it believable on some level. We all know an elevator can’t go upwards and downwards and backwards and forwards and sideways and slantways … but we tend to imagine that it could during the film.

We also imagine the movie could carry us along with it as long as it wishes. There was no wasted space, filled time, or moments that made me check my watch, as I often do at the theater. Yet, it left me satisfied that the complete story had been told.

There are three things, other than the skill of the actors and producers, that make me love this movie. First, I laughed all the way through it. That is odd for me. I’m not that easily impressed. The snippy lines, well-written and well-delivered, were irresistible. Even better, they were intelligently humorous. I find that lacking in most movies.

Second, the music was magnificent –- as varied and as unexpected as Wonka’s candy creations. The genius of composer Danny Elfman, combined with Burton’s vision of the film, and the actual lyrics written by Roald Dahl created a spectacular collage of humor, sarcasm, creepiness, and contemplation. That, alone, should mark this as one of the best films of the summer.

Third, this version has that all-important element of story-telling that Stuart’s film was missing: character growth. Burton picked up on the whys of the novel, filling in extra information to give the viewer reasons for characters being as they were. In the original, none of the characters changed. Charlie was a sweet child who won his reward for remaining a sweet child. The other children received their retributions for not being sweet children. Willy Wonka also stayed the same loving, caring man. In Burton’s (and Dahl’s) Charlie, however, Willy Wonka changed throughout the adventure. By getting to know Charlie, and having his offer refused, Willy learned an important lesson: family comes first. His whole attitude adjusts, slowly, throughout the film. We get to watch him grow.

Overall, the film quality of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (2005) is unrivaled this summer. It is still a family film, for those with older children (younger ones may be unsettled during certain scenes). If you’re ready for a good laugh and fun romp that involves highly intelligent conversation and unerring production, go see Tim Burton’s Charlie.
About this Entry
thinkin
Sep. 19th, 2005 @ 09:10 am Sir Elton Rocks the MCI
Current Music: This Song's For You
Inspirational.

If I had to choose one word to describe Elton John’s performance at the MCI Center in Washington D.C. on September 10th, that would be the one. It could be that all of his shows are, but since this was the first time I have been able to attend, I can only speak for this one.

Being that it was the great Sir Elton, I did expect to enjoy the show. After all, I have been a fan for nearly twenty years. I find his music uplifting, upbeat, empathetic, and very meaningful. Much of it is just pure fun, as well. I believe, though, that I wasn’t prepared for the whole experience that is Elton John.

The voice, live and untouched, echoed throughout the center with a strength even the mastered albums can’t imitate. It is hard to describe the sound of the show. Along with the traditional keyboard, guitarists, and drummer, there was an additional percussion set, and a whole set of backup singers who sang with him in the studio while recording “Peachtree Road,” his newest album. They were all second, of course, to Elton’s piano skills. I was intimately glad to be sitting where I could watch his hands while he played. I was in awe.

Gracious and humble, Sir Elton apologized for his audience having to sit through so many new songs: he performed the whole Peachtree album. The apology was unnecessary, but it showed a humility that evolved throughout the evening. He also explained the background of each new song.

One of the new titles, “My Elusive Drug,” is a love song, and on stage, Elton was honest about it being autobiographical, letting us know he was truly happy in a relationship since walking away from the drugs and alcohol of his earlier life. There were two messages in that simple statement. One, the obvious: sedating yourself sedates your entire life. And two, that he is a regular human being finding his way just as the rest of us.

“Freaks in Love” reiterates this point. He humbly classified himself as one of the freaks, those who aren’t beautiful and skinny and perfect.

Leaving the stage only once before the end of the show, for a very brief respite following the Peachtree songs, he came back to rev up the audience with many of his classics. “Crocodile Rock” was featured, as was “Levon” and “Tiny Dancer” and so many others that reminded us just who was up there on that stage performing in front of the huge, sold-out center.

In between, he wandered the stage, walking up and down the length in front of the audience who rushed forward, hands pushing toward him. Many major pop stars would never even walk so close. Sir Elton took many hands that evening and left his autograph with a number of thrilled fans.

The most poignant moment, though, came when I watched a younger fan in a wheelchair being escorted closer to the stage, in hopes of touching the star. He reached out, behind others doing the same, who could reach higher standing on their feet. Sir Elton saw him, walked directly in front of him, but couldn’t reach: the stage was too high. So he laid down, flat on his stomach, and pushed his arm out into the crowd, taking the young man’s hand.

There was applause from the crowd for this, but Elton simply stood again and went to his piano, obviously as touched by the young man as the young man, and the rest of the audience, was by him. It showed in his expression.

The show lasted two hours and forty-five minutes with no real intermission. The memory will be forever. I walked in a fan of his music and walked out a fan of the man, with much admiration and respect. I rarely get to concerts, but I will go again, given a chance.

I went home inspired, seeing that sometimes, though rarely, a legend doesn’t disappoint us. Sometimes good people who simply do what they do best and follow their hearts get where they should be and take us along for the ride.
About this Entry
thinkin
May. 30th, 2005 @ 11:17 am Phantom Of The Opera * * * *
Current Music: All I Ask Of You - Andrew Lloyd Webber
I truly wanted to see this one in the theater, but missed it, as it was given a too-short play life. So, I bought the DVD. I usually rent instead but have heard great reviews and I have always loved the music of Andrew Lloyd Webber. Any musical that features his music is worth watching simply for the music.

Phantom is no exception. I had to hush my kids so I wouldn't miss any of the haunting lyrics and orchestration that didn't hold their interest as well as it did mine. But part of me believes I should have been a musician, with as much hold as music has on me. Since I'm not one, I have to rely on the genius of others to fulfill the need for gorgeous melodies and lyrics that seep into my soul.

The music was the best part of the movie. Don't get me wrong; the scenery was lavish and exquisite and the whole production was excellent quality. I think, though, to make it more marketable and easier to watch for those less into musicals, that it could have been slightly converted to include more regular speech during the sections that didn't need to rely on song to help further the plot. It was slightly hard to follow the details of the story, which I think is why so many people shy away from musicals. They want the story details. That's hard to do without including more dialogue. And dialogue gives us a break between musical numbers that would make the actual songs more endearing. "My Fair Lady" is one of my favorite musicals, along with "Fiddler On The Roof." They both include plenty of dialogue to build the story while also including gorgeous music. "Phantom" would have worked better that way, also.

I do intend to get the soundtrack, and I'm sure I will watch the DVD again occasionally, though my TV viewing time is very limited so I have to be choosy.

Overall, "Phantom of the Opera" is worth watching. It is a classic, after all.
About this Entry
thinkin
May. 24th, 2005 @ 05:59 pm Star Wars 3 - The Hype
I didn't plan to go see this movie in the theater because I wasn't impressed with the one before it. However, we ended up going over the weekend. Okay, but it wasn't my idea. Two members of my household are more fanatic about it than I am.

The review: it was better than the last one. And I was very gratified to see that they put some of the humor back in, as I kept fussing about concerning the last two. I missed the humor of the originals. One of the things I liked the most about this one was when the little guy sitting beside me kept saying "he's funnier now"! Apparently, I'm not the only one who missed the humor. Even a young child noticed. And it was funnier. It was also more violent, but not horribly. Overall, it was a good movie, except...

Mr. Lucas has apparently forgotten a few things about the basics of a good story. Without giving anything away, towards the end of the movie, there are characters who suddenly become important who we have never even seen yet! It's pivotal to the movie, but they just kind of appear out of thin air. That doesn't work in good fiction. Also, there was nothing to explain what had already happened so if you haven't seen the first two, expect to be completely lost. That's not acceptable in fiction sequels, either.

One other thing that bothered me was that it felt like it was just "filling in the middle of the story," which of course it was, but it shouldn't have felt like it, right? Shouldn't it have been able to stand completely on its own? Aren't novel sequels supposed to do that? Okay, this is a movie, but it's still storytelling. They use the same principles. Also, unless a viewer already knows about Anakin's past, his descent to the dark side will not be at all believable, as it happens so quickly. I still found it rather hard to believe.

I came away from this "last" Star Wars movie feeling like we had just been taken in by the hype; knowing that even with all of the obvious flaws in the storyline, people will be raving about how wonderful it is only because it's Star Wars.
About this Entry
books
Apr. 30th, 2005 @ 10:10 pm rob thomas ...something to be
I've been trying to come here to do a review of this CD ever since I bought it the day after it was released. But I've been afraid of not doing it justice.

Rob Thomas is the musical equivalent, in my estimation, of Johnny Depp, and I'm a huge fan of Mr. Depp.

I've been wondering about Rob Thomas' reasons for separating from Matchbox 20, a band I adore, for this solo venture. Finding an article online explaining his reasoning, basically for wanting to expand what he does without being limited by the band's sound, I was glad to hear there will be more from the group, also. To me, though, Rob Thomas is the heart and soul of Matchbox 20, and I'll keep buying their music as long as he keeps fronting the band.

That's not always true of a band. It's not always the lead singer that holds me. Actually, it tends to be the main songwriter(s). I respect singers/musicians who write their own songs, and I'm a language person: the lyrics have to touch me and really mean something. A good voice isn't really that hard to find. Look at American Idol. A good voice in a musician who writes good songs is much more rare. Rob Thomas is that rare find who does it all seemingly without effort.

I love the musical variation in this CD. It flows from full rock band sound with "this is how a heart breaks" to the 'Latiny' "lonely no more" to near-acoustic sound in "when the heartache ends" to the jazzy "something to be" while all the time still sounding like Rob Thomas' individual style.

The song I'm most addicted to, however, is "all that i am." The mirimba (from the xylophone family) beginning the tune echoes the overall haunting feel throughout. Thomas' voice rings beautifully over the interesting choice of instruments creating this one-of-a-kind sound. And the lyrics are that of a poet. If I'm not driving while listening to the cd, I stop what I'm doing and just close my eyes and listen whenever "all that i am" comes on, often repeating it to just stop and listen again.

I tend to do the same with the closing song, "now comes the night." But then, I've always loved the sound of a pure voice accompanied by piano without interfering, unnecessary electronics.

Overall, "...something to be" is what a CD should be. I can't wait for the next one, with the group or solo.
About this Entry
books
Apr. 21st, 2005 @ 01:02 pm Spring Cleaning
Current Music: All That I Am - Rob Thomas
I've been doing a lot of gardening since spring warmed the air enough that I want to be out in it. Today, I'm tending my journal.

As those who have been here before will notice, it has a whole new look, and a new title. I had wandered well away from the path I had planned for this space and am heading back to start again. My thoughts about cultural issues will be kept in a different journal (the link is above) and writing issues will be addressed in my writing journal.

This one will be reserved for my reviews of the different arts.

Wishing you happy creativity!
About this Entry
books
Jan. 5th, 2005 @ 08:06 pm Giving
Current Music: Amazing Grace
My first post of the new year will be short and simple: links to four charitable sites I believe in and support. (Clicking on links will open a new window.)

www.booksforsoldiers.com - Donate used books, etc to service members serving overseas

At www.booksforsoldiers.com, you can register to check the request list for our troops overseas who would love to have used books, dvds, cds, etc. as moral boosters. Well-run site.



www.musicforrelief - Donate to help the Tsunami victims

Linkin Park not only sent a large donation, but they also set up this fundraising site and are asking not only their fans, but music fans and musicians everywhere to chip in whatever they can to help the millions of homeless in Asia trying to rebuild their lives after the Tsunami. Donations go to the Red Cross. Please check them out and spread the site around.



www.komen.org - Support Breast Cancer Research and save lives

The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation is fighting to eradicate breast cancer through research and education. Please join them.



www.modimes.org - Saving the lives of babies

The March of Dimes saves the lives of babies every day through research and education. What a beautiful gift to all of us.



Wishing You Peace.
About this Entry
thinkin
Dec. 31st, 2004 @ 02:59 pm New Endings
Current Mood: contemplative
Current Music: Auld Lang Syne
2004 is ending a year of big emotional events with a disaster that is only what a pessimistic writer could have imagined. It is the day after tomorrow in Asia and we are all grieving with them. Disaster movies aren't funny, or entertainment, to me because of this - because too much of it can really happen. I don't watch war movies for the same reason. I don't want to see people going through those things because it IS reality for too many. I don't watch reality shows, either, in general.

I caught half of Nanny 911 the other day and that one looks like it's worth watching. Why? Because so many parents really do need guidance. They're good people doing their best to do what is right for their children, but it's hard to know when you're on the right track and many haven't had great parenting examples. The show I watched was right on track with the advice given by the nanny. She emphasized encouragement and communication with firm but fair discipline. So maybe there is a place for reality on television - if it's helpful in some way and not another "let's bash each other personally to make ourselves feel better and come out 'ahead'" show. Isn't there enough of that in the world?

Anyway, as the year ends, I'm looking back and being grateful not only for the good things that have happened personally, but also for the bad things that I got through. They have shaped me as a person, made me see things in different ways, and again showed me that "this too shall pass." My faith has been strengthened after years of being slightly lost because of the hypocrisy I've seen, and I support our president in his search for morals and Christian values in America. I'm sure I won't agree with every decision he makes, as I haven't always in the last four years, but I'm still behind his genuine desire to make this a better place, and a safer world.

When I say Christian values, I mean looking at the basis of the Christian religion, the one that is optimistic, friendly, open, and urges us all to treat each other as family we love. To me, it is the philosophy of it that matters the most. We all have choices. When we hurt others, we are hurting ourselves. Many religions, if not all, have the same basic philosophy. I pray that we can all reach for that basic philosophy and let go of the trivial specifics that keep us apart.

I wish for our country that it can work on mending itself socially. United We Stand is not just a phrase. It is also a philosophy. We all basically want the same things. It's the "how" that causes the problem. For some reason, the how has taken over as the main issue, overriding the main fact that we all want the same thing. I hope we can all start to remember that and be more understanding of differences of opinions. I also hope that we can start seeing more positives instead of looking for and spreading only negatives. Optimism is contagious.

I wish for those countries torn apart by wars, epidemics, and disasters that they will find relief in the year to come and the will to keep going and keep trying to make things better, and that they can believe that they will.

To all who actually read my ramblings here, I wish you peace, happiness, and lots of love in 2005, and the opportunities to let your spirit grow and soar.

God Bless.



Happy Hogmanay!
About this Entry
thinkin
Nov. 29th, 2004 @ 04:15 pm Finding Neverland * * * * *
Current Mood: groggy
Wow! Go see it! And take the kids (school age and older - others won't really get it though it's okay for them).

So nice to see such a great movie with no sex and no violence. And such wonderful acting by Mr. Depp and co. I rarely do theaters, but I may go to this one again, and will definitely buy it when it comes out on DVD.

It's the type of movie that had people just sitting and thinking about it afterwards, not jumping up to rush out of the theater.

Best Picture Award material.
About this Entry
books
Nov. 20th, 2004 @ 11:06 pm Lack of Phonics - a link to ADHD?
Current Mood: accomplished
Current Music: none - enjoying quiet while I have it
I create a newsletter for my infant class's parents and like to throw in tidbits of info so while searching the other day, I found an amazing article. I was researching phonics because it's a big issue for me and makes me insane that they don't teach it in schools. I knew it was bad for our kids and that so many of them don't read well because of it, but what I found was like a big brain-opener!

"Some of the most advanced scientific research suggests that ADD/ADHD and dyslexia do not cause poor academic performance but may in fact be the result of bad reading instruction."

The article says that we are, in fact, causing harm to our children and holding them back by not teaching them phonics. From what I learned in cognition, it makes a LOT of sense. HOW we learn actually shapes our neural pathways in our brains and when kids don't learn the structure of language, they have a hard time using language. The improper shaping also makes it harder for them to learn other subjects because they haven't learned HOW to learn!

There are actually a lot of articles about the importance of phonics, but relating this to ADHD ... well, everyone keeps asking why there is such a influx of it in recent years. This is why - because phonics used to be taught until the whole language method came out. It makes sense that more boys than girls are labelled with ADHD since language is naturally harder for them and this just makes it impossible. So they get frustrated and start blocking it out and finding other things to do with their brains (fidgeting, daydreaming) instead of letting themselves be constantly irritated by trying to learn something that feels impossible.

It IS impossible. Those kids can not possibly memorize every single word that is used in the English language, which is what whole language does.

I kept getting frustrated because one of my children would learn vocabulary words one week well enough to get 100% and then the next week wouldn't remember any of them. They labelled the child with a short-term memory disorder. Hmm.... No, it's not a disorder. He hasn't been taught HOW to learn. His brain hasn't been trained the way it should have been.

This is a crime to our children. We're holding them back with whole language. Our national report card shows that ever since whole language came out, reading skills have continued to drop. Only 1/3 of our students are proficient readers! That is unbelievable.

Check it out, do the research, then contact your school boards and insist that our children need phonics!

-- -- --
**article source: Thompson, C. Bradley. Is phonics rich instruction ... needed in U.S. classrooms? "Insight on the News" Mar 29, 2004, p.46. Retrieved November 15, 2004, from Extended Academic ASAP database.
About this Entry
thinkin
Oct. 18th, 2004 @ 09:02 pm a thought to remember
Current Mood: pensive
Current Music: Guitars in the Forest (at work today)
"When I judge art, I take my painting and put it next to a God made object like a tree or flower. If it clashes, it is not art."

Paul Cezanne
About this Entry
thinkin
Oct. 11th, 2004 @ 06:27 pm A quote
Current Mood: groggy
Current Music: Mozart
"The best thing commercially, which is the worst artistically, by and large, is the most successful."

Orson Welles
About this Entry
thinkin
Sep. 6th, 2004 @ 08:59 pm The film industry
Current Mood: pensive
Current Music: again - just quiet
I just returned from a long weekend and have an early morning, but just found this and thought it was interesting:

Venice protesters - yahoo news

Apparently, the discouragement over Hollywood's overbearing presence and extravagance is fairly widespread. I love the comment about culture being for everyone (not just those who can afford $40 for their family to go see a movie).

More soon.
About this Entry
books
Jun. 16th, 2004 @ 07:45 pm Indie Arts
Current Mood: anxious
Current Music: No Big Deal - Steadman
The current arts issue that's stuck in my brain is about all of the record labels now being sued for not paying royalties to their artists. I made mention of it on the list of a group who was just dropped from their label because of a buyout by another company. This is a hot young band with so much potential they have Paul McCartney's stamp of approval. Yet, they were dropped, as well as most of the rest of the acts on the bought-out label. I have no doubts that they will rise above and come out just fine. After all, their first CD was independent, done on their own label. Personally, I'd prefer to see them stay independent. The market is all about making money for the execs. My comment on the list was replied to by someone saying: that's just how it is - get used to it.

Hmmm... I'm sure this person has no idea that I have realized for quite some time that it IS that way. In fact, I have stayed independent myself for partially that reason. I don't want to lose control and line someone's pocket who cares nothing about me. Okay, I'm getting ahead of myself. I'm not lining any pockets at the moment, but if it came to that, I would rather hire friends and family to do management work. Most acts, musicians, writers, etc. are expected to do their own promotion, getting the word out themselves with help from any fans who become devoted. If they don't, they don't sell. The big execs do actually very little to earn the big dollars they are making. The thing is, artists don't expect that going in. They expect, once they have a contract, to be promoted and taken care of and helped along. They don't expect everyone who is supposed to be working for them to screw them over to make a buck, though that is exactly what happens more often than not.

I have seen it too often. The law suits are now proving it. My advice for today: support indie artists. They are becoming very easy to find.

A good start: Steadman

Another: Swansea Music

--
By the way, I have been busy with end of school year activities, including my own finals. I'm hoping to keep up better here now, but am about to embark on a two day drive to visit family for a week, adding up to a week and a half after including the two day drive home again. Hoping for no flooded roads in between.
About this Entry
books